Celebrating Australia Day

As Australia Day rolls around again we’re encouraged to celebrate the nation’s official birthday. I’ve mentioned before my agitation about “celebrating” the invasion and near genocide of another people that this day represents.

Since writing that post, I’ve had the thought that if we are to continue celebrating on this date, that the celebration should be something akin to the sentiment engendered in ANZAC day. While a celebratory event, ANZAC day begins with a solemn reflection on lives lost and the cost of war. As the day progresses it transforms into a celebration of the human spirit — of overcoming and moving on from hard times, of friends and family, of sacrifice and valour.

Perhaps if Australia Day was practiced in this manner, I could support it. Imagine if at the beginning of the day we acknowledged the First Australians and the terrible wrongs wrought upon them in the foundation of the English phase of this nation? That we acknowledged and reflected on the lives lost, on the traditions ignored and broken. Then, perhaps, after this solemn expression we could begin to celebrate recent achievements and a vision for the future.

This is highly unlikely to happen, of course. This nation has been built upon a racist foundation — from terra nullius to the stolen generation to the White Australia policy. And that foundation still manifests in so many ways — from the relatively silent (for example, the Northern Territory “intervention” which is barely discussed) to the more vocal, such as the so-called “debate” on refugee policy. I put “debate” in quotation marks, because it is not. It is a race to the bottom as political parties and the media1 clamour for the most headline-catching (and usually inhumane) way to “manage” distraught and desperate people trying to flee war and persecution. All fuelled by a public sentiment that is so fearful of “the other” and an ignorance of the beauty and benefits of other cultures.

The only glimmer of hope I see in this discourse comes from SBS, with a string of excellent documentary series that aim to bring to light alternative perspectives on the race and immigration debate. From First Australians to Immigration Nation to Go Back to Where You Came From to the most recently aired Once Upon a Time in Cabramatta, SBS seems to be the only (relatively) mainstream media entity willing to actually tackle the issue with any degree of respect and balance.

Contrast that collection of works with the jingoistic nationalist tripe that gets rolled out annually across the commercial networks. Until the types of stories that appear on SBS are being told regularly on Sixty Minutes and Today Tonight, we have a long way to go before we can truly come to grips with our past, reconcile with our indigenous and immigrant brothers and sisters, and truly celebrate our nation moving forward.

I love a good BBQ. I drink beer with my mates and celebrate “mateship”. I believe in this supposed Australian tradition of a “fair go”. I am a fervent NRL fan and love heading down the pub to watch the grand final with the rest of the rabble. I’ll cheer Lleyton and Bernard, or Clarkey and the team. I’ll gladly give some good-humoured stick to the Kiwi’s or the Poms when we get up in the union, cricket, rugby (or anything really).

I celebrate and enjoy these traditions. But I can’t bring myself to celebrate this day. I find it a sad shame that when I see people displaying an Australian flag (on a temporary tattoo or on their car or in their window) that I can’t help but think there’s a racist “go home” intent.

All that said, I will appreciate Australia Day, in all of its complexity, in solemn reflection and respect. I hope you do too…

  1. The only time I’ve seen the Daily Telegraph display a pro-refugee headline was when it was an opportunity to beat up on the Gillard Government’s policies (or, more to the point, a beat up on “Julia”). As an aside, is there any male Prime Minister where it was ok to reference them by their first name so readily? I don’t remember Kevin or John or Paul being bandied about quite so freely in the press and public discourse. But I digress…

Liberal rebels

Webdiary: Rebel Libs leap from 5 to 9: Howard gets more talks.

After a two and a half hour debate, Georgiou agreed not to introduce his bills this week as planned, and to advise the next party room meeting, on June 14, of his intention to do so if no compromise could be reached with Howard. He would then insert the bill for House of Representatives debate on June 20. In the meantime, Georgiou and the other rebels agreed to talks with Howard and Vanstone.

Read the full text. I’m disappointed there isn’t more support for it…

Later, Margo sums up Labor’s lacklustre support as “gutless“. Too right.

Dear Petro…

I just sent this email to Petro Georgiou:

Dear Petro,

I read with great interest today in the Sydney Morning Herald about two private members bills you, along with Judi Moylan, are presenting in relation to refugees and asylum seekers. From what I have read, your proposals address both our human rights obligations and security concerns very well.

I am writing simply to thank you for your efforts in addressing this critical human rights issue. Your courageous stand is much appreciated by many members of the community, not just myself.

Regardless of whether the bills are accepted by your party colleagues, your efforts will be remembered.

Regards, Grant

Positive change…

SMH: Liberal MP’s bid to overturn detention law.

I think that all of us who are concerned about this issue should contact Mr Georgiou thanking him for taking such a courageous step. I can only imagine the pressure he is under in introducing these bills.

Webdiary has more – including the specific text here and here. I haven’t had a chance to read either yet, but from the SMH overview they seems to be a pretty big step forward.

As an aside, Webdiary is also doing something very interesting to get to the facts of the Vivien Alvarez case.

Update: Check the comments for details of how to contact Minister Georgiou. (Thanks spiralgirl)

Refugees: Forgotten People

The Democrats remind us that the supposed “enemy of the people” from the last election campaign are still suffering, but lost in the public mind in amongst record spending sprees and campaign launches.

There are still hundreds of people, including children, still being traumatised in long-term immigration detention, one for over six years,” said Democrats’ Leader Senator Andrew Bartlett releasing the party’s comprehensive refugee package in Adelaide today.

I’ve been reading a bunch of the Dems press releases – they continue to impress me on policy decisions. I’ll be voting Labor in the house of reps (mainly because we have a Labor-Left candidate in the seat I live in) but I will be voting the Dems in the Senate. They’re the only party that seems to call things the way I see things. Sometimes I disagree on certain topics, of course, but on the whole they are balanced and fair and forward thinking.

And one things for certain, we need the Dems in the senate to keep all the bastards honest, whichever side of the political fence they come from…

To and fro

Latham announces that any US-FTA will be referred to a Senate Comittee. The Greens respond.

Seems Bob liked Latham’s speech today too – with some caveats of course 😉

I noticed the SMH reports on a rift in the ALP on the asylum policy. Glad to see that it isn’t plain sailing – let’s hope a few more issues are addressed between now and the election, although I’m not holding my breath.

Not good enough

The Australian Democrats: Labor raises the bar even higher.

“Labors so called new position doesnt end mandatory detention, it blatantly ignores the UNHCRs stand on protection, it ignores our obligations under international conventions and it ignores the effects of granting only short term protection to people fleeing persecution, torture and trauma.”